Discourse Analysis (com335)
Course Code | Course Name | Semester | Theory | Practice | Lab | Credit | ECTS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
com335 | Discourse Analysis | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
Prerequisites | |
Admission Requirements |
Language of Instruction | French |
Course Type | Elective |
Course Level | Bachelor Degree |
Course Instructor(s) | Michel Bourse mbourse@gmail.com (Email) |
Assistant | |
Objective | The objective of the course is to study the discourse: this one involves a linguistic act from which a text is emerging, a context and an intention. Accordingly the discoure is a complex entity having a linguistic dimension (as text), a sociological dimension (as production in context), and a communicative dimension (as finalized interaction). |
Content | Critical history of Discourse theories. Information approach, linguistic approach and pragmatic approach |
Course Learning Outcomes | |
Teaching and Learning Methods | Lectures and oral presentations by students |
References |
Adam J-M : Introduction à l'analyse textuelle des discours, Armand Colin 2005, Paris Adam J.-M : Les textes : Types et Prototypes, Nathan 1992, Paris Adam J. M.; Nolke H. : Approches modulaires, Delachaux et Niestlé 1999, Paris Anscombre J. C.; Ducrot O. : L’argumentation dans la langue, Mardaga 1983, Liège Authier-Revuz, J. : "Hétérogénéité montrée et hétérogénéité constitutive : Eléments pour une approche de l'autre dans le discours", DRLAV 26, 1982, p. 91-151. Austin J. L : Quand dire c’est faire, Seuil 1970, Paris Bakhtine M. : Le marxisme et la philosophie du langage, Minuit 1977, Paris Bally Ch. : a.- Le langage et la vie, Droz, 3e ed 1965, Genève Bally Ch. : b.- Traité de stylistique française, Librairie de l’Université, 5e éd, vol I, 1970, Genève Benveniste E. : Problèmes de linguistique générale, Gallimard 1966, 1974, T.1 & 2, Paris Benveniste E. : Problèmes de linguistique générale, Gallimard 1966, T.1, Paris Berthoud A-C., Mondada L. : Modèles du discours en confrontation, Peter lang 2000, Bern Bronckart J. P. : activité langagière, textes et discours : pour un interactionnisme socio-discursif, Delachaux et Niestlé 1997, Lausanne Coirier P., Gaonac’h D. et Passerault J.-M. : Psycholinguistique textuelle, Approche cognitive de la compréhension et de la production des textes, Armand Colin/Masson 1996, Paris Courtine J.-J. : Quelques problèmes théoriques et méthodologiques en Analyse du discours. A propos du discours communiste adressé aux chrétiens, Langage, no 62 Charolles M. & al : Le discours, représentations et interprétations, PUN 1990, Nancy Dictionnaire de Linguistique, Larousse 1973, Paris Ducrot O. : Dire et ne pas dire, Hermann, 3e ed 1998, Paris Ducrot O. : Les mots du discours, Minuit 1980, Paris Ducrot O. : Le dire et le dit, Minuit 1984, Paris Ducrot O. : Le dire et le dit, Minuit 1984, Paris Grésillon, A. & Maingueneau, D. : "Polyphonie. proverbe et détournement", Langages no 73, 1984 Ghiglione R. et Blanchet A. : Analyse de contenu et contenus d’analyse, Dunod 1991, Paris Ghiglione R. : Je vous ai compris ou l’analyse du discours politique, Armand Colin 1989, Paris Groupe Saint-Cloud: L’image candidate à l’élection présidentielle de 1995, (Analyse des discours dans les médias), L’Harmattan 1999, Paris Haillet, P. : Le conditionnel en français, une approche polyphonique, Ophrys 2002, Paris Jaubert A. : La lecture pragmatique, Hachette 1990, Paris Jakobson R. : Essais de linguistique générale, Minuit 1963, Paris K-Orecchioni C., Cosnier J., Coulon J. et Berrendonner A. : Les voies du langage, Bordas/Dunod 1982, Paris K-Orecchioni C. et Moillaud M. : Le discours politique, PUL 1984, Lyon K-Orecchioni C. : Les interactions verbales, vol 3, Armand Colin 1994, Paris Kramsch C. : Interaction et discours dans la classe de langue, Hatier 1984, Paris Maingueneau D. : Initiation aux méthodes de l’analyse du discours, Hachette 1976, Paris Maingueneau D. : Les termes clés de l’analyse du discours, Seuil 1996, Paris Maingueneau D. : Nouvelles tendances en Analyse du discours, Hachette, Paris, 1987 Maingueneau D. : Analyser les textes de communication, Dunod, Paris, 1998 Maingueneau D. & Charaudeau P. : Dictionnaire d’analyse du discours, Seuil 2002, Paris Marcellesi J-B. : Le Congrès de Tours, études sociolinguistiques, Le Pavillon 1971, Paris Meyer M.: Logique, langage et argumentation, Hachette 1982, Paris Michaux, C. : "Le proverbe dans la théorie de la polyphonie", Paremia no 6, pp393-398. Miller, K. : Communication theories : perspectives, processes, and contexts, (2nd ed.), McGraw-Hill 2005, New York Moeschler J. & Reboul A. : Dictionnaire encyclopédique de pragmatique, Seuil 1994, Paris Moeschler J. & Reboul A : La pragmatique aujourd'hui : Une nouvelle science de la communication, Seuil 1998, Paris Moeschler J. & Reboul A. : Pragmatique du discours (de l’interprétation de l’énoncé à l’interprétation du discours), Armand Colin 1998, Paris Roche J. : Le style des Candidats à la Présidence de la République (1965-1969), Privat 1971, Toulouse Roig Ch. : Le vocabulaire politique de Lénine, l’Age d’Homme 1980, Lausanne Revue Langages : Le discours politique, Didier/Larousse, no 23, sept. 1971, Paris Revue Langages : Analyse du discours, Didier/Larousse, no 13, mars 1969, Paris Roulet, E. Filliettaz L. et Grobet A. : Un modèle et un instrument d’analyse de l’organisation du discours, Peter Lang 2001, Bern Roulet E. : La description de l’organisation du discours, Didier 1999, Paris Regard J. : Manipulation - Ne Vous Laissez Plus Faire, Organisation Editions, 2004, Paris Saussure F. : Cours de linguistique générale, Payot 1922, Paris Searle J. R. : Sens et expression, étude de théorie des actes du langage, Minuit 1982, Paris Searle J. R. : Sens et expression (étude de théorie des actes du langage), Minuit 1982, Paris Trognon A. et Larrue J. : Pragmatique du discours politique, Armand Colin 1994, Paris Widdowson H. G. : Une approche communicative de l’enseignement des langues, Hatier 1981, pp 32-67, Paris |
Theory Topics
Week | Weekly Contents |
---|---|
1 | Definition of the discourse |
2 | About information and communication |
3 | The communication model : the issues |
4 | Information model |
5 | Linguistic model |
6 | Speech linguistic |
7 | Sociolinguistic model |
8 | Pragmatic model |
9 | Interactionnist model |
10 | Oral presentation of books by students (cf. Bibliography) |
11 | Oral presentation of books by students (cf. Bibliography) |
12 | Oral presentation of books by students (cf. Bibliography) |
13 | Oral presentation of books by students (cf. Bibliography) |
14 | Oral presentation of books by students (cf. Bibliography) |
Practice Topics
Week | Weekly Contents |
---|
Contribution to Overall Grade
Number | Contribution | |
---|---|---|
Toplam | 0 | 0 |
In-Term Studies
Number | Contribution | |
---|---|---|
Assignments | 0 | 0 |
Presentation | 1 | 60 |
Midterm Examinations (including preparation) | 1 | 40 |
Project | 0 | 0 |
Laboratory | 0 | 0 |
Other Applications | 0 | 0 |
Quiz | 0 | 0 |
Term Paper/ Project | 0 | 0 |
Portfolio Study | 0 | 0 |
Reports | 0 | 0 |
Learning Diary | 0 | 0 |
Thesis/ Project | 0 | 0 |
Seminar | 0 | 0 |
Other | 0 | 0 |
Toplam | 2 | 100 |
No | Program Learning Outcomes | Contribution | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | Will have effective written and oral communication skills in Turkish | X | ||||
2 | Will have a thorough knowledge of at least two foreign languages | X | ||||
3 | Will be informed about art and culture, human rights, social, professional and ethical values, law and legislation, quality standards, and will be aware of their responsibility on these subjects | X | ||||
4 | Will have sufficient knowledge about social sciences, professions and sectors in communication and media, innovative and entrepreneurial practices | X | ||||
5 | Will have the ability to use, in an effective and creative way, the techniques and tools and information technologies necessary for interactive and conventional media, in the context of health and safety in the workplace | X | ||||
6 | Will have the ability to develop documentary and fictional content related to their field for interactive and conventional media; also the ability to produce and manage this content in group | X | ||||
7 | Will have the theoretical knowledge and ability to carry out and share scientific work on communication environments and processes of interactive and conventional media and on the individual and social outcomes of the latter | X | ||||
8 | Will have the knowledge of analysis and modelling techniques to analyse interactive and conventional media and the communication environments and processes | X | ||||
9 | Will have the ability to question and critically analyse developments and problems concerning interactive and conventional media and the communication environments and processes, will be aware of the public interest, social responsibility and the environment, will be sensitive to contemporary world’s and Turkey's current problems; will develop a libertarian, democratic, constructive and problem-solving approach | X | ||||
10 | They are familiar with the historical development processes of electronic, digital media and film; and the current developments in these fields | |||||
11 | They learn sociological, cultural and aesthetic approaches in electronic, digital media and film | |||||
12 | They learn the political economy of cultural industries, labour and production relations, analysis of marketing and consumption patterns. | X | ||||
13 | They learn at a first level how to use the equipment necessary for the production of audio-visual content for TV, radio and digital media and of films in different genres | |||||
14 | They gain experience in conducting creative activities in electronic, digital media and film; in producing and working in groups | |||||
15 | They acquire theoretical information in the fields of public relations, advertising, integrated marketing communication and organizational communication | |||||
16 | They are familiar with the research, planning, implementation and evaluation processes in public relations and advertising; they can create campaigns, present them effectively and write reports | |||||
17 | They have knowledge of organisational communication, crisis and risk communication, reputation management, media relations, media planning, digital media management, brand management and interpersonal communication. They are able to carry out activities in these areas | |||||
18 | They use public relations and advertising strategies and tactics appropriate to the specificities of conventional and new media | |||||
19 | They are aware of legal regulations, ethical codes in public relations and advertising, and they remain faithful to them | |||||
20 | They are familiar with the different theoretical approaches regarding the social place, role and functions of journalism as a social institution and phenomenon; they are familiar with the process of producing information for conventional and digital media | |||||
21 | They are familiar with the structural and technical specificities, management characteristics of conventional/mainstream media, as well as alternative media structures | |||||
22 | They are familiar with the new conceptual and theoretical discussions emerging from interactive/digital media in terms of social sciences and humanities | |||||
23 | They are familiar with the historical development of journalism in Turkey and in the world; they can analyse it in the context of social and political history | |||||
24 | They have the ability to effectively use information technology, printing and publishing techniques; to write a press article using data collected on the web and on social media, to visualize this data and to publish it |
Activities | Number | Period | Total Workload |
---|---|---|---|
Class Hours | 14 | 2 | 28 |
Working Hours out of Class | 14 | 2 | 28 |
Presentation | 5 | 2 | 10 |
Final Examinations (including preparation) | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Total Workload | 66 | ||
Total Workload / 25 | 2,64 | ||
Credits ECTS | 3 |