Seminar
moztek@gsu.edu.tr
Content
Objective
This seminary aims to develop students's capacity to make of bibliographical searches in order to write an article in a specific subject
Course Content
The course aims at comparing the problem of composabilité - which results from preKantian ontologies, from that of Leibnitz- with the doctrine of the transcendental schematism of Kant. It is a question of thinking about what prevents us from seeing the multiplicity which has not happened yet - in the universe and in the historic world has - as a phenomenon. The course looks for an answer to the question asked by Alain Badiou (has the dialectic closed branches?) in his comment on the Hegelian dialectic.
Course Learning Outcomes
Ability of methodological researche, to write an article
Teaching and Learning Methods
Writing and corréctions of articles, critique of presentations
References
Recent works and various sources of the history of philosophy: Descartes, Kant, Leibniz, Deleuze, Badiou
Weekly Contents
| Week | Weekly Contents |
|---|---|
| 1 | 1.st course : Introduction |
| 2 | 2.nd course : Introduction to research |
| 3 | 3.rd course : Identify a research question |
| 4 | 4.th course : Make a simple retrieval |
| 5 | 5.th course : Concepts related to descriptive research |
| 6 | 6.th course : Survey |
| 7 | 7.th course : Observation |
| 8 | 8.th course : Concepts related to experimental research |
| 9 | 9.th course : Concepts related to data analysis |
| 10 | 10.th course : Analysis |
| 11 | 11.th course : Analysis of research papers and discussions |
| 12 | 12.th course : Presentation |
| 13 | 13.th course : Mid-term |
| 14 | 14.th course : Presentation (Researches and Reports) |
Assessment System
| Activities | Number | Contribution |
|---|---|---|
| Contribution of in-term studies to overall grade | 1 | 40 |
| Contribution of final exam to overall grade | 1 | 60 |
| Total | 2 | 100 |
| Activities | Number | Contribution |
|---|---|---|
| Assignments | 1 | 40 |
| Presentation | 0 | 0 |
| Midterm Examinations (including preparation) | 0 | 0 |
| Project | 0 | 0 |
| Laboratory | 0 | 0 |
| Other Applications | 0 | 0 |
| Quiz | 0 | 0 |
| Term Paper/ Project | 0 | 0 |
| Portfolio Study | 0 | 0 |
| Reports | 0 | 0 |
| Learning Diary | 0 | 0 |
| Thesis/ Project | 0 | 0 |
| Seminar | 0 | 0 |
| Other | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 1 | 40 |
Relation of Proficiency
| No | Program Learning Outcomes | Contribution | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | At the end of the program successful students, Will have a good command of the concepts and theories of different areas of Business Administration such as Production, Marketing, Accounting/Finance, Management and Organizational Behavior and will have an integrative point of view to understand the interaction between these domains. | X | ||||
| 2 | Will be able to grasp the operation of different functions (Accounting /Finance, Marketing, Human Resources, and Management) of organizations and also will be able to create hypotheses for research proposals. | X | ||||
| 3 | Will be able to do research for determining changes, diagnosing problems and developing solutions in business world. | X | ||||
| 4 | Will have a command of qualitative and quantitative research methodology. | X | ||||
| 5 | Will be able to conduct statistical analyses and interpret the results. | X | ||||
| 6 | Will have a command of scientific studies (writing articles, presenting papers) | X | ||||
| 7 | Should have mastery of at least one foreign language at a scientific level to be able to realize cross-cultural studies. | X | ||||
ECTS
| Activities | Number | Period | Total Workload |
|---|---|---|---|
| Class Hours | 14 | 3 | 42 |
| Working Hours out of Class | 13 | 1 | 13 |
| Assignments | 1 | 15 | 15 |
| Midterm Examinations (including preparation) | 0 | 3 | 0 |
| Final Examinations (including preparation) | 1 | 30 | 30 |
| Total Workload | 100 | ||
| Total Workload / 25 | 4.00 | ||
| Credits ECTS | 4 | ||