Law

Comparative Law II(HUK304)

Course Code Course Name Semester Theory Practice Lab Credit ECTS
HUK304 Comparative Law II 6 2 0 0 2 3
Prerequisites
Admission Requirements
Language of Instruction French
Course Type Compulsory
Course Level Bachelor Degree
Course Instructor(s) Mouloud BOUMGHAR boumghargsu@gmail.com (Email)
Assistant
Objective The objective of the course is to demonstrate the important role played by supranational courts in exercising their functions at European and international level. Their diversity is often presented as a sign of progress in law. However, it increases also the risk of conflict of authority between competing jurisdictions and the development of conflicting jurisprudence.
The rapid development of supranational justice has not only questions the consistency of the system, bur in each jurisdiction posed difficult problems of organization and operation which will be studied.
Content Week 1. The origin and composition of the Court of Luxembourg

Week 2. The competences of the Court of Luxembourg

Week 3. The proceedings before the Court of Luxembourg

Week 4. Place of the court of Luxembourg in the legal of the EC

Week 5. The origin and composition of the Court of Strasbourg

Week 6. The competences of the Court of Strasbourg

Week 7. The proceedings before the Court of Strasbourg

Week 8. Midterm exam

Week 9. The origin and composition of the international court of justice

Week 10. The competences of the international court of justice

Week 11. Ad hoc criminal tribunals

Week 12. The origin and composition of the international criminal court

Week 13. The proceedings before the international criminal court

Week 14. Crimes punishable by the international criminal court
Course Learning Outcomes 1.Major stages of the supranational courts

2. Structure and functioning of the supranational courts
Teaching and Learning Methods
References Readings for European jurisdictions:

- V. Berger, La jurisprudence de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme, Sirey, dernière édition.
- J-C. Gautron, Droit européen, Dalloz, Mémento, dernière édition.
- J-P. Jacqué, Droit institutionnel de l’Union Européenne, Dalloz, dernière édition.
- J. Roux, Droit général de l’Union européenne, Litec, dernière édition.
- F. Sudre, Les grands arrêts de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme, PUF.
- F. Sudre, Droit européen et international des droits de l’homme, PUF.
Readings for international jurisdictions:

- D. Carreau, « Droit international, Paris, Pedone
- J. Combacau et S. Sur, Droit international public, Paris, Montchrestien
- P.-M. Dupuy, Droit international public, Paris, Dalloz
- D. Ruzie, Droit international public, Mémento Dalloz, dernière édition.
- Antonio Cassese & Mireille Delmas-Marty (dir), Crimes internationaux et juridictions internationales, Paris, Puf
- Delas (Olivier), Côté (René), Crépeau (François) et Leuprecht (Peter) (dir.), Les juridictions internationales: complémentarité ou concurrence? Bruxelles: Bruylant, coll. Mondialisation et droits de l’Homme
- Bourdon (W.): "La Cour pénale internationale", Seuil
- André Huet, René Koering-Joulin, Droit pénal international, PUF
- R. Badinter, De Nuremberg à la CPI, Pouvoirs, janvier 2000, p. 155.
- R. Kherard, La compétence de la Cour pénale internationale, Dalloz, 2000, p. 587.
Print the course contents
Theory Topics
Week Weekly Contents
Practice Topics
Week Weekly Contents
Contribution to Overall Grade
  Number Contribution
Contribution of in-term studies to overall grade 0 0
Contribution of final exam to overall grade 0 0
Toplam 0 0
In-Term Studies
  Number Contribution
Assignments 0 0
Presentation 0 0
Midterm Examinations (including preparation) 0 0
Project 0 0
Laboratory 0 0
Other Applications 0 0
Quiz 0 0
Term Paper/ Project 0 0
Portfolio Study 0 0
Reports 0 0
Learning Diary 0 0
Thesis/ Project 0 0
Seminar 0 0
Other 0 0
Toplam 0 0
No Program Learning Outcomes Contribution
1 2 3 4 5
1 Recognizing fundamental legal concepts, defining, interpreting and using them.
2 Recognizing fundamental disciplines of law and their content, including legislation, case-law and the doctrine in the relevant discipline.
3 Recognizing positive norms in the legislation and being able to define and explain the principals of methodology.
4 Being able to determine, identify and restate legal problems.
5 Being able to use legal interpretation principals in an efficient manner in order to analyse and resolve a legal problem and in order to develop a strategy.
6 Being able to conduct academic researches on legal problems and to propose solutions.
7 Assuming responsibility individually or collectively for resolving complicated legal problems.
8 Being able to criticise positive norms of the law system.
9 Being able to explain technical legal knowledge in Turkish, French and English verbally or in writing, being able to report personal opinion concerning a legal problem verbally or in writing in a persuasive manner.
10 Being able to follow up the local and international legal literature, to update technical legal knowledge permanently, to use information technology in an efficient manner in order to achieve these goals.
11 Being able to conduct comparative academic researches between different law systems.
12 Respecting human rights and universal principals and notions of law.
13 Respecting the ethical standarts, good faith, fairness and equity principals.
14 Being sensitive to social problems, democracy, laicism and rule of law principal.
Activities Number Period Total Workload
Total Workload 0
Total Workload / 25 0,00
Credits ECTS 0
Scroll to Top