French Cef B2. 2 Academic(FLF201)
| Course Code | Course Name | Semester | Theory | Practice | Lab | Credit | ECTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLF201 | French Cef B2. 2 Academic | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Prerequisites | |
| Admission Requirements |
| Language of Instruction | |
| Course Type | Compulsory |
| Course Level | Bachelor Degree |
| Course Instructor(s) | Ömer Mert YILMAZ omyilmaz@gsu.edu.tr (Email) magali sabio (Email) |
| Assistant | |
| Objective |
- Acquisition of level B2 - Prepare students for Delf / Dalf certifications - Develop the disciplinary lexical field through the biannual project |
| Content |
4 hours of weekly lessons + 3 debates This course is organized around the following objectives: - Make contact and assess the communication needs to carry out an event (project) - Understand a well-argued position, a criticism ... - Identify the organization of argumentative speeches, oral / written - Identify and explain / reformulate arguments - Report ideas, arguments - Organize a communication plan (project) - Concede or refute an argument (debates) - Propose solutions (debates) - Pass a judgment on an event, a social event, a work of art ... - Write an argumentative text (Work criticism) - Express your opinion in a justified manner - Write an experience report (project) |
| Course Learning Outcomes |
At the end of the course, students should be able to: - Pass the Delf B2 - Express your opinion on a subject specific to the disciplinary field or on a topical subject |
| Teaching and Learning Methods |
- Activities to work on the 4 skills (Listening / Speaking / Reading / Writing) - Semester project: Organize and put into action the communication plan of an event (Exhibition, conference, debate ...) - 2 tasks: - Make an audio capsule - Write a review of the work |
| References | Course file for the semester prepared by the teacher |
Theory Topics
| Week | Weekly Contents |
|---|---|
| 1 | Responding to a problematic, structuring the opinions |
| 2 | Formulating hypothesis |
| 3 | Making a plan/an introduction/a conclusion |
| 4 | Express subjectivity/ modulate |
| 5 | Present the ideas/argue |
| 6 | Debate on a subject/Oral preparation for B2 |
| 7 | Presentations |
| 8 | Presentations |
| 9 | Reform/organise the point of views |
| 10 | Writing a paragrapf |
| 11 | Learning to write a dissertation |
| 12 | Writing preparation for B2 |
| 13 | Organising the dissertation |
| 14 | Dissertation |
Practice Topics
| Week | Weekly Contents |
|---|
Contribution to Overall Grade
| Number | Contribution | |
|---|---|---|
| Contribution of in-term studies to overall grade | 3 | 60 |
| Contribution of final exam to overall grade | 1 | 40 |
| Toplam | 4 | 100 |
In-Term Studies
| Number | Contribution | |
|---|---|---|
| Assignments | 0 | 0 |
| Presentation | 0 | 0 |
| Midterm Examinations (including preparation) | 1 | 40 |
| Project | 3 | 60 |
| Laboratory | 0 | 0 |
| Other Applications | 0 | 0 |
| Quiz | 0 | 0 |
| Term Paper/ Project | 0 | 0 |
| Portfolio Study | 0 | 0 |
| Reports | 0 | 0 |
| Learning Diary | 0 | 0 |
| Thesis/ Project | 0 | 0 |
| Seminar | 0 | 0 |
| Other | 0 | 0 |
| Toplam | 4 | 100 |
| No | Program Learning Outcomes | Contribution | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | Recognizing fundamental legal concepts, defining, interpreting and using them. | X | ||||
| 2 | Recognizing fundamental disciplines of law and their content, including legislation, case-law and the doctrine in the relevant discipline. | X | ||||
| 3 | Recognizing positive norms in the legislation and being able to define and explain the principals of methodology. | X | ||||
| 4 | Being able to determine, identify and restate legal problems. | X | ||||
| 5 | Being able to use legal interpretation principals in an efficient manner in order to analyse and resolve a legal problem and in order to develop a strategy. | X | ||||
| 6 | Being able to conduct academic researches on legal problems and to propose solutions. | X | ||||
| 7 | Assuming responsibility individually or collectively for resolving complicated legal problems. | X | ||||
| 8 | Being able to criticise positive norms of the law system. | X | ||||
| 9 | Being able to explain technical legal knowledge in Turkish, French and English verbally or in writing, being able to report personal opinion concerning a legal problem verbally or in writing in a persuasive manner. | X | ||||
| 10 | Being able to follow up the local and international legal literature, to update technical legal knowledge permanently, to use information technology in an efficient manner in order to achieve these goals. | X | ||||
| 11 | Being able to conduct comparative academic researches between different law systems. | X | ||||
| 12 | Respecting human rights and universal principals and notions of law. | X | ||||
| 13 | Respecting the ethical standarts, good faith, fairness and equity principals. | X | ||||
| 14 | Being sensitive to social problems, democracy, laicism and rule of law principal. | X | ||||
| Activities | Number | Period | Total Workload |
|---|---|---|---|
| Class Hours | 12 | 2 | 24 |
| Working Hours out of Class | 6 | 5 | 30 |
| Assignments | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Presentation | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Midterm Examinations (including preparation) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Project | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Laboratory | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Other Applications | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Final Examinations (including preparation) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Quiz | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Term Paper/ Project | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Portfolio Study | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Reports | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Learning Diary | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Thesis/ Project | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Seminar | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Other | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total Workload | 54 | ||
| Total Workload / 25 | 2.16 | ||
| Credits ECTS | 2 | ||