Individual application to the constitutional court(HUK452)
| Course Code | Course Name | Semester | Theory | Practice | Lab | Credit | ECTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HUK452 | Individual application to the constitutional court | 8 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
| Prerequisites | |
| Admission Requirements |
| Language of Instruction | Turkish |
| Course Type | Elective |
| Course Level | Bachelor Degree |
| Course Instructor(s) | Özen ÜLGEN ADADAĞ ozen.ulgen@gmail.com (Email) Burcu ALKIŞ balkis@gsu.edu.tr (Email) |
| Assistant | |
| Objective | Examining individual application to the Turkish Constitutional Court in the light of the case law of the Constitutional Court and the European Court of Human Rights. |
| Content |
1- The function of the individual application 2- Capacity to apply 3- The scope of the right to apply 4- The subject of the individual application 5- Conditions of application 6- The review of the complaint by the Constitutional Court 7- Decisions of the Constitutional Court concerning the application 8- Mid-term exam 9- Case law of the Constitutional Court and the European Court of Human Rights concerning fundamental rights in the scope of the individual application 10- Case law of the Constitutional Court and the European Court of Human Rights concerning fundamental rights in the scope of the individual application 11- Case law of the Constitutional Court and the European Court of Human Rights concerning fundamental rights in the scope of the individual application 12- Case law of the Constitutional Court and the European Court of Human Rights concerning fundamental rights in the scope of the individual application 13- Case law of the Constitutional Court and the European Court of Human Rights concerning fundamental rights in the scope of the individual application 14- Case law of the Constitutional Court and the European Court of Human Rights concerning fundamental rights in the scope of the individual application |
| Course Learning Outcomes |
- Individual application procedure before the Constitutional Court. - Case law of the Constitutional Court and the European Court of Human Rights on the rights under the scope of individual application. |
| Teaching and Learning Methods | Lectures, study of the relevant case law of the Turkish Constitutional Court and the European Court of Human Rights |
| References |
Relevant case law of the Turkish Constitutional Court and the European Court of Human Rights ALTIPARMAK, Kerem/CENGİZ, Serkan/GÖZTEPE, Ece/ÖZDOĞAN, Sedef/SAĞLAM, Fazıl, Anayasa Mahkemesinin Kuruluş ve Yargılama Usulleri Hakkında Kanun Tasarısına İlişkin Çalışma Grubu Raporu, İzmir Barosu İçin Hazırlanan Rapor, 2011. Anayasa Mahkemesine Bireysel Başvuru, Ankara: TBB, 2011. Anayasa Yargısı, S. 21, Ankara: AYM, 2004. Anayasa Yargısı, S. 26, Ankara: AYM, 2009. Anayasa Şikâyeti-Vervassungsbeschwerde, Ankara: AÜHF, 2009. ARNWINE, Selin ESEN, “İspanya’da Bireysel Başvuru Yolu, AÜSBFD, 52(4), 2003, s. 249-271. AYDIN, Öykü Didem, “Anayasa Mahkemesine Bireysel Başvuru Yolu”, Gazi Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, C. XV (2011), S.4, s. 121-174. ÇELİK, Burak/ESEN, Selin/GÖZTEPE, Ece/Mumcu, Ahmet/SABUNCU, Yavuz/SAĞLAM, Fazıl/ŞENOL, Talay, Anayasa Şikâyetinin Türkiye’de Yüksek Yargı Organlarınca Benimsenmesini ve Sağlıklı Bir Biçimde Uygulanmasını Sağlayacak Adımların Atılması Konusunda Görüşler, TBB İnsan hakları Merkezi İçin Hazırlanan Rapor, 2007. DOĞRU, Osman, Anayasa Mahkemesine Bireysel Başvuru Rehberi, İstanbul: Legal, 2012. European Commission for Democracy Through Law (Venice Commission), Study on Individual Access to Constitutional Justice, CDL-AD (2010)039. European Commission for Democracy Through Law (Venice Commission), Opinion on the Law on the Establishment and Rules of Procedure on the Constitutional Court of Turkey, CDL-AD (2011)040. GÖREN, Zafer, “Anayasa Mahkemesi’ne Kişisel Başvuru (Anayasa Şikâyeti)”, Anayasa Yargısı, S. 11, Ankara: AYM, s. 97-134. GÖREN, Zafer, “Anayasa Şikâyeti: Külfetsiz, Masrafsız ve Sonuçsuz?”, Prof. Dr. Ergun Özbudun’a Armağan, C. II, Ankara: Yetkin, 2008, s. 293-337. GÖZTEPE, Ece, Anayasa Şikâyeti, Ankara: AÜHF, 1998. GÖZTEPE, Ece, “Türkiye’de anayasa Mahkemesine Bireysel Başvuru Hakkının (Anayasa Şikâyeti) 6216 Sayılı Kanun Kapsamında değerlendirilmesi”, Türkiye Barolar Birliği Dergisi, 2011 (95), s. 13-40. Güncel Hukuk, Eylül 2013/9-157 (Anayasa Mahkemesine Bireysel Başvuru sayısı). İNCEOĞLU, Sibel (Ed.), İnsan Hakları Avrupa Sözleşmesi ve Anayasa, İstanbul: Beta, 2013. KANADOĞLU, Osman Korkut, Türk ve Alman Anayasa Yargısında Anayasal Değerlerin Çatışması ve Uyumlaştırılması, İstanbul: Beta, 2000. La protection des droits fondamentaux par la Cour constitutionnelle, Strasbourg: Conseil de l’Europe, 1996. ODER, Bertil Emrah, “Türkiye’de Anayasa ve Anayasa Yargısı”, http://www.konrad.org.tr/23.%20Journalisten%20tr/191-208.pdf. PEKCANITEZ, Hakan, “Mukayeseli Hukukta Medeni, Yargıda Verilen Kararlara Karşı Anayasa Şikâyeti”, Anayasa Yargısı, S. 12, Ankara: AYM, s. 257-287. SAĞLAM, Fazıl, “Anayasa Şikâyeti Kurumunun Türk Hukukuna Kazandırılması İle İlgili Sorunlar ve Çözüm Olanakları”, Anayasa Yargısı İncelemeleri, Mehmet TURHAN ve Hikmet TÜLEN (haz.), Ankara: AYM, 2006, s. 69-11. SAĞLAM, Fazıl, “Türk ve Alman Hukukları Açısından Anayasa Yargısının Sorunları”, Erdoğan Teziç’e Armağan, İstanbul: Galatasaray Üniversitesi, s. 137-151. SAĞLAM, Fazıl, “Hukuk Devleti ve Terör”, AÜSBF Dergisi (Yavuz Sabuncu’ya Armağan), 62:3, Temmuz-Eylül 2007, s. 291-317. SAĞLAM, Fazıl, “Anayasa Şikâyeti Üzerine Düşünceler”, İlhan Unat’a Armağan, Ankara: Mülkiyeliler Birliği, 2011. SAĞLAM, Fazıl, “Anayasa Şikâyeti-Anlamı, Kapsamı ve Türkiye Uygulamasında Olası Sorunlar”, Demokratik Anayasa, Ece GÖZTEPE ve Aykut ÇELEBİ (haz.), İstanbul: Metis, 2012, s. 418-466. SAĞLAM, Musa (ed.), Bireysel Başvuru-“Anayasa Şikâyeti”, Ankara: HUKAB, 2011. TAŞKIN, Ahmet (ed.), AİHM ve Türkiye II- Anayasa Şikâyeti ve AİHM, Ankara: TAA, 2010. |
Theory Topics
| Week | Weekly Contents |
|---|---|
| 1 | The function of the individual application |
| 2 | Capacity to apply |
| 3 | The scope of the right to apply |
| 4 | The subject of the individual application |
| 5 | Conditions of application |
| 6 | The review of the complaint by the Constitutional Court |
| 7 | Decisions of the Constitutional Court concerning the application |
| 8 | Mid-term exam |
| 9 | Case law of the Constitutional Court and the European Court of Human Rights concerning fundamental rights in the scope of the individual application |
| 10 | Case law of the Constitutional Court and the European Court of Human Rights concerning fundamental rights in the scope of the individual application |
| 11 | Case law of the Constitutional Court and the European Court of Human Rights concerning fundamental rights in the scope of the individual application |
| 12 | Case law of the Constitutional Court and the European Court of Human Rights concerning fundamental rights in the scope of the individual application |
| 13 | Case law of the Constitutional Court and the European Court of Human Rights concerning fundamental rights in the scope of the individual application |
| 14 | Case law of the Constitutional Court and the European Court of Human Rights concerning fundamental rights in the scope of the individual application |
Practice Topics
| Week | Weekly Contents |
|---|
Contribution to Overall Grade
| Number | Contribution | |
|---|---|---|
| Contribution of in-term studies to overall grade | 1 | 40 |
| Contribution of final exam to overall grade | 1 | 60 |
| Toplam | 2 | 100 |
In-Term Studies
| Number | Contribution | |
|---|---|---|
| Assignments | 0 | 0 |
| Presentation | 0 | 0 |
| Midterm Examinations (including preparation) | 0 | 0 |
| Project | 0 | 0 |
| Laboratory | 0 | 0 |
| Other Applications | 0 | 0 |
| Quiz | 0 | 0 |
| Term Paper/ Project | 0 | 0 |
| Portfolio Study | 0 | 0 |
| Reports | 0 | 0 |
| Learning Diary | 0 | 0 |
| Thesis/ Project | 0 | 0 |
| Seminar | 0 | 0 |
| Other | 0 | 0 |
| Toplam | 0 | 0 |
| No | Program Learning Outcomes | Contribution | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | Recognizing fundamental legal concepts, defining, interpreting and using them. | X | ||||
| 2 | Recognizing fundamental disciplines of law and their content, including legislation, case-law and the doctrine in the relevant discipline. | X | ||||
| 3 | Recognizing positive norms in the legislation and being able to define and explain the principals of methodology. | X | ||||
| 4 | Being able to determine, identify and restate legal problems. | X | ||||
| 5 | Being able to use legal interpretation principals in an efficient manner in order to analyse and resolve a legal problem and in order to develop a strategy. | X | ||||
| 6 | Being able to conduct academic researches on legal problems and to propose solutions. | X | ||||
| 7 | Assuming responsibility individually or collectively for resolving complicated legal problems. | X | ||||
| 8 | Being able to criticise positive norms of the law system. | X | ||||
| 9 | Being able to explain technical legal knowledge in Turkish, French and English verbally or in writing, being able to report personal opinion concerning a legal problem verbally or in writing in a persuasive manner. | X | ||||
| 10 | Being able to follow up the local and international legal literature, to update technical legal knowledge permanently, to use information technology in an efficient manner in order to achieve these goals. | X | ||||
| 11 | Being able to conduct comparative academic researches between different law systems. | X | ||||
| 12 | Respecting human rights and universal principals and notions of law. | X | ||||
| 13 | Respecting the ethical standarts, good faith, fairness and equity principals. | X | ||||
| 14 | Being sensitive to social problems, democracy, laicism and rule of law principal. | X | ||||
| Activities | Number | Period | Total Workload |
|---|---|---|---|
| Class Hours | 14 | 1 | 14 |
| Midterm Examinations (including preparation) | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| Final Examinations (including preparation) | 1 | 5 | 5 |
| Total Workload | 21 | ||
| Total Workload / 25 | 0,84 | ||
| Credits ECTS | 1 | ||