Criminal Law II
ukocasakal@gmail.com
pkartal@gsu.edu.tr
ierdogan@gsu.edu.tr
Content
Objective
LEARNING FUNDAMENTAL CONCEPTS OF CRIMINAL LAW AND THE GENERAL THEORY OF CRIME
Course Content
Week 1Concept of illegality
Week2.Justification causes on Articles 24 and 26 of the Turkish Criminal Code
Week 3.Self-defense (part I)
Week 4. Self-defense (part II)
Week 5.State of necessity (part I)
Week 6.State of necessity (part II)
Week 7.Imputability
Week 8.Culpability and intent (part I)
Week 9.Intent (part II)
Week 10.Negligence
Week 11.Exculpation grounds
Week 12.Participation
Week 13.Joinder of crimes
Week 14.Sanction
Course Learning Outcomes
SOLVING A CONCRETE PROBLEM BY USING THE FUNDAMENTAL CONCEPTS OF CRIMINAL LAW AND APPLYING THE GENERAL THEORY OF CRIME TO CONCRETE SITUATIONS
Teaching and Learning Methods
Theory and practice
References
DÖNMEZER –ERMAN, Nazari ve Tatbiki Ceza Hukuku
DEMİRBAŞ, Ceza Hukuku Genel Hükümler
CENTEL – ZAFER – ÇAKMUT, Türk Ceza Hukukuna Giriş
Assessment System
| Activities | Number | Contribution |
|---|---|---|
| Contribution of in-term studies to overall grade | 40 | 0 |
| Contribution of final exam to overall grade | 60 | 0 |
| Total | 100 | 0 |
| Activities | Number | Contribution |
|---|---|---|
| Assignments | 0 | 0 |
| Presentation | 0 | 0 |
| Midterm Examinations (including preparation) | 1 | 40 |
| Project | 0 | 0 |
| Laboratory | 0 | 0 |
| Other Applications | 0 | 0 |
| Quiz | 0 | 0 |
| Term Paper/ Project | 0 | 0 |
| Portfolio Study | 0 | 0 |
| Reports | 0 | 0 |
| Learning Diary | 0 | 0 |
| Thesis/ Project | 0 | 0 |
| Seminar | 0 | 0 |
| Other | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 1 | 40 |
Relation of Proficiency
| No | Program Learning Outcomes | Contribution | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | Recognizing fundamental legal concepts, defining, interpreting and using them. | X | ||||
| 2 | Recognizing fundamental disciplines of law and their content, including legislation, case-law and the doctrine in the relevant discipline. | X | ||||
| 3 | Recognizing positive norms in the legislation and being able to define and explain the principals of methodology. | X | ||||
| 4 | Being able to determine, identify and restate legal problems. | X | ||||
| 5 | Being able to use legal interpretation principals in an efficient manner in order to analyse and resolve a legal problem and in order to develop a strategy. | X | ||||
| 6 | Being able to conduct academic researches on legal problems and to propose solutions. | X | ||||
| 7 | Assuming responsibility individually or collectively for resolving complicated legal problems. | X | ||||
| 8 | Being able to criticise positive norms of the law system. | X | ||||
| 9 | Being able to explain technical legal knowledge in Turkish, French and English verbally or in writing, being able to report personal opinion concerning a legal problem verbally or in writing in a persuasive manner. | X | ||||
| 10 | Being able to follow up the local and international legal literature, to update technical legal knowledge permanently, to use information technology in an efficient manner in order to achieve these goals. | X | ||||
| 11 | Being able to conduct comparative academic researches between different law systems. | X | ||||
| 12 | Respecting human rights and universal principals and notions of law. | X | ||||
| 13 | Respecting the ethical standarts, good faith, fairness and equity principals. | X | ||||
| 14 | Being sensitive to social problems, democracy, laicism and rule of law principal. | X | ||||
ECTS
| Activities | Number | Period | Total Workload |
|---|---|---|---|
| Class Hours | 3 | 14 | 42 |
| Working Hours out of Class | 7 | 4 | 28 |
| Assignments | 5 | 4 | 20 |
| Final Examinations (including preparation) | 7 | 3 | 21 |
| Total Workload | 111 | ||
| Total Workload / 25 | 4.44 | ||
| Credits ECTS | 4 | ||