New Institutions in Turkish Code of Obligations(ÖHYL-335)
Course Code | Course Name | Semester | Theory | Practice | Lab | Credit | ECTS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ÖHYL-335 | New Institutions in Turkish Code of Obligations | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 7 |
Prerequisites | |
Admission Requirements |
Language of Instruction | Turkish |
Course Type | Elective |
Course Level | Masters Degree |
Course Instructor(s) | Hüseyin Murat DEVELİOĞLU hmdevelioglu@gmail.com (Email) |
Assistant | |
Objective | Providing information on the legal institutions newly introduced by the Code of Obligations |
Content | As shown under the subject headings (topics) |
Course Learning Outcomes | Gaining detailed knowledge on the legal institutions newly introduced by the Code of Obligations |
Teaching and Learning Methods | Ex-cathedra and presentations |
References |
Cevdet Yavuz, Borçlar Hukuku Özel Hükümler, İstanbul 2014. Aydın Zevkliler, Emre Gökyayla, Borçlar Hukuku Özel Borç İlişkileri, Ankara, 2017. Kemal Oğuzman, Turgut Öz, Borçlar Hukuku Genel Hükümler, İstanbul 2018. Fikret Eren, Borçlar Hukuku, Genel Hükümler, İstanbul 2018. Pierre Tercier, Pascal Pichonnaz, Murat Develioğlu, Borçlar Hukuku Genel Hükümler, İstanbul, 2016. Pierre Tercier, Pascal Pichonnaz, Droit des obligations, Zürich, 2012. S. Sulhi Tekinay, Haluk Burcuoğlu, Sermet Akman, Atilla Altop, Borçlar Hukuku, Genel Hükümler, İstanbul 1993. Haluk Nomer, Borçlar Hukuku Genel Hükümler, İstanbul, 2019. Necip Kocayusufpaşaoğlu, Borçlar Hukuku Genel Hükümler Cilt I, Filiz Kitabevi, 2017. Pierre Engel, Traité des obligations en droit suisse, 2ème édition, 1997. Commentaire Romand Code des obligation art. 1-529, 2ème édition, Bâle, 2012. |
Theory Topics
Week | Weekly Contents |
---|---|
1 | Delivery of Unsolicited Goods |
2 | Standart Terms |
3 | Liability for Risks |
4 | Temporary Payment to be Made to the Prejudiced Party |
5 | Joint and Several Liability and Upper Limit of Liability |
6 | Default of the Debtor in Continuous Contracts |
7 | Release |
8 | Partial Impossibility of Performance |
9 | Hardship |
10 | Accession to the Obligation |
11 | Transfer of the Contract |
12 | Accession to the Contract |
13 | Prohibition of Agreement to the detriment of the Lessee and Prohibition of Interlinked Contracts |
14 | The Spouse's Consent to and the Rules on the Form of Surety Contract and the Scope of Application of the Provisions regarding the Surety Contract |
Practice Topics
Week | Weekly Contents |
---|
Contribution to Overall Grade
Number | Contribution | |
---|---|---|
Contribution of in-term studies to overall grade | 1 | 40 |
Contribution of final exam to overall grade | 1 | 60 |
Toplam | 2 | 100 |
In-Term Studies
Number | Contribution | |
---|---|---|
Assignments | 0 | 0 |
Presentation | 1 | 40 |
Midterm Examinations (including preparation) | 0 | 0 |
Project | 0 | 0 |
Laboratory | 0 | 0 |
Other Applications | 0 | 0 |
Quiz | 0 | 0 |
Term Paper/ Project | 0 | 0 |
Portfolio Study | 0 | 0 |
Reports | 0 | 0 |
Learning Diary | 0 | 0 |
Thesis/ Project | 0 | 0 |
Seminar | 0 | 0 |
Other | 0 | 0 |
Toplam | 1 | 40 |
No | Program Learning Outcomes | Contribution | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | Recognizing positive norms in private law and being able to define and explain the principals of methodology, | X | ||||
2 | Being able to determine, identify and restate legal problems, | X | ||||
3 | Being able to use legal interpretation principals in an efficient manner in order to analyze and resolve a legal problem and in order to develop a strategy, | X | ||||
4 | Being able to conduct academic researches on legal problems and to propose solutions, | X | ||||
5 | Assuming responsibility individually or collectively for resolving complicated legal problems, | X | ||||
6 | Being able to criticise positive norms of the law system, | X | ||||
7 | Being able to explain technical legal knowledge in private law in Turkish, French and English verbally or in writing, being able to report personal opinion concerning a legal problem verbally or in writing in a persuasive manner, | X | ||||
8 | Being able to follow up the local and international legal literature, to update technical legal knowledge permanently, to use information technology in an efficient manner in order to achieve these goals, | X | ||||
9 | Being able to conduct comparative academic researches between different law systems, | X | ||||
10 | Being able to explain and utilize academic study methodologies in order to conduct academic research on a certain legal problem. | X |
Activities | Number | Period | Total Workload |
---|---|---|---|
Class Hours | 14 | 2 | 28 |
Working Hours out of Class | 14 | 8 | 112 |
Presentation | 1 | 2 | 2 |
Final Examinations (including preparation) | 1 | 18 | 18 |
Total Workload | 160 | ||
Total Workload / 25 | 6,40 | ||
Credits ECTS | 6 |