Proceedings for Collusion and Avoidance of Legal Acts(EHYL-346)
| Course Code | Course Name | Semester | Theory | Practice | Lab | Credit | ECTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EHYL-346 | Proceedings for Collusion and Avoidance of Legal Acts | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 6 |
| Prerequisites | |
| Admission Requirements |
| Language of Instruction | Turkish |
| Course Type | Elective |
| Course Level | Masters Degree |
| Course Instructor(s) | Güray ERDÖNMEZ gerdonmez@gsu.edu.tr (Email) |
| Assistant | |
| Objective | Objective of the course is to understand the difference between the collusion action and the nullity action and to solve the problems that it meets in practice |
| Content |
Concept of collusion Sorts of collusion Impact of collusion by obligation law Impact of collusion by inheritance law Object of nullity action Onerous savings which are the object of collusion action Gratuitous savings which are the object of collusion action Savings which are the object of collusion action because of intention to damage Relation between collusion action and nullity action Attributive competence and territorial competence in the nullity action- period of prosecute a suit Parties of the nullity action Procedure in the nullity action Consequences of nullity action by law of enforcement Consequences of nullity action by law of bankruptcy |
| Course Learning Outcomes | Comprehension of the objectives indicated in the part of course and the content of the collusion action and the nullity action by obligation law, inheritance law, law of enforcement- bankruptcy |
| Teaching and Learning Methods | Oral |
| References |
Hakan Pekcanıtez/Oğuz Atalay/Meral Sungurtekin Özkan/ Muhammet Özekes, İcra ve İflâs Hukuku Ders Kitabı, 4. Bası, İstanbul 2017. Baki Kuru, İcra ve İflas Hukuku El Kitabı, 2. Bası, Ankara 2013. Güray Erdönmez, Alacaklılara Zarar Verme Kastıyla Yapılan Tasarrufların İptali, İstanbul 2017. |
Theory Topics
| Week | Weekly Contents |
|---|---|
| 1 | Concept of collusion |
| 2 | Sorts of collusion |
| 3 | Impact of collusion by obligation law |
| 4 | Impact of collusion by inheritance law |
| 5 | Object of nullity action |
| 6 | Onerous savings which are the object of collusion action |
| 7 | Gratuitous savings which are the object of collusion action |
| 8 | Savings which are the object of collusion action because of intention to damage |
| 9 | Relation between collusion action and nullity action |
| 10 | Attributive competence and territorial competence in the nullity action- period of prosecute a suit |
| 11 | Parties of the nullity action |
| 12 | Procedure in the nullity action |
| 13 | Consequences of nullity action by law of enforcement |
| 14 | Consequences of nullity action by law of bankruptcy |
Practice Topics
| Week | Weekly Contents |
|---|
Contribution to Overall Grade
| Number | Contribution | |
|---|---|---|
| Contribution of in-term studies to overall grade | 1 | 50 |
| Contribution of final exam to overall grade | 1 | 50 |
| Toplam | 2 | 100 |
In-Term Studies
| Number | Contribution | |
|---|---|---|
| Assignments | 0 | 0 |
| Presentation | 0 | 0 |
| Midterm Examinations (including preparation) | 0 | 0 |
| Project | 0 | 0 |
| Laboratory | 0 | 0 |
| Other Applications | 0 | 0 |
| Quiz | 0 | 0 |
| Term Paper/ Project | 0 | 0 |
| Portfolio Study | 0 | 0 |
| Reports | 0 | 0 |
| Learning Diary | 0 | 0 |
| Thesis/ Project | 0 | 0 |
| Seminar | 1 | 0 |
| Other | 0 | 0 |
| Toplam | 1 | 0 |
| No | Program Learning Outcomes | Contribution | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | Recognizing positive norms in economic law and being able to define and explain the principals of methodology, | X | ||||
| 2 | Being able to determine, identify and restate legal problems, | X | ||||
| 3 | Being able to use legal interpretation principals in an efficient manner in order to analyze and resolve a legal problem and in order to develop a strategy, | X | ||||
| 4 | Being able to conduct academic researches on legal problems and to propose solutions, | X | ||||
| 5 | Assuming responsibility individually or collectively for resolving complicated legal problems, | X | ||||
| 6 | Being able to criticise positive norms of the law system, | X | ||||
| 7 | Being able to explain technical legal knowledge in economic law in Turkish, French and English verbally or in writing, being able to report personal opinion concerning a legal problem verbally or in writing in a persuasive manner, | X | ||||
| 8 | Being able to follow up the local and international legal literature, to update technical legal knowledge permanently, to use information technology in an efficient manner in order to achieve these goals, | X | ||||
| 9 | Being able to conduct comparative academic researches between different law systems, | X | ||||
| 10 | Being able to explain and utilize academic study methodologies in order to conduct academic research on a certain legal problem. | X | ||||
| Activities | Number | Period | Total Workload |
|---|---|---|---|
| Class Hours | 14 | 3 | 42 |
| Working Hours out of Class | 14 | 3 | 42 |
| Assignments | 14 | 1 | 14 |
| Presentation | 14 | 1 | 14 |
| Other Applications | 14 | 1 | 14 |
| Final Examinations (including preparation) | 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Quiz | 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Total Workload | 140 | ||
| Total Workload / 25 | 5,60 | ||
| Credits ECTS | 6 | ||