Annulment of Objection in Legal Enforcement Law(ÖHDR-373)
Course Code | Course Name | Semester | Theory | Practice | Lab | Credit | ECTS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ÖHDR-373 | Annulment of Objection in Legal Enforcement Law | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 7 |
Prerequisites | |
Admission Requirements |
Language of Instruction | Turkish |
Course Type | Elective |
Course Level | Doctoral Degree |
Course Instructor(s) | Güray ERDÖNMEZ gerdonmez@gsu.edu.tr (Email) |
Assistant | |
Objective | Examination of problematic matters of the release of the opposition |
Content |
Theoretical fundamentals Juridical nature Comparison with cancel of opposition Documents that can be used Definitive objection to the opposition Definitive objection to the opposition in comparative law Temporary objection to the opposition in comparative law Action in denial of debt Proof The substitution of a party Synallagmatic contracts Objection to the opposition in arbitration Current account reconciliations Remedies |
Course Learning Outcomes | Comprehension of the objectives indicated in the part of course objective |
Teaching and Learning Methods | Oral |
References |
Staehelin Daniel/Bauer Thomas, Basler Kommentar: Bundesgesetz über Schuldbetreibung und Konkurs I (Art 1-158 SchKG), 2. Auflage, Basel 2016. Gilliéron Pierre Robert, Commentaire de la loi fédérale sur la poursuite pour dettes et la faillite (Art. 1-88), Basel 1999. Arslan Ramazan/Yılmaz Ejder/ Ayvaz Taşpınar Sema: İcra ve İflâs Hukuku, 2. Baskı, Ankara 2016. Berkin, Necmeddin M.: Tatbikatçılara İcra Hukuku Rehberi, İstanbul 1980. Kuru Baki: İcra ve İflâs Hukuku, C. I, 3. Bası, İstanbul 1988. Kuru Baki: İcra ve İflâs Hukuku El Kitabı, 2. Baskı, İstanbul 2013. Kuru Baki: İstinaf Sistemine Göre İcra ve İflâs Hukuku Ders Kitabı, Ankara 2017. Muşul Timuçin: İcra ve İflâs Hukuku, 6. Bası, Ankara 2014. Pekcanıtez Hakan/Atalay Oğuz/Sungurtekin Özkan Meral/ Özekes Muhammet: İcra ve İflâs Hukuku, 11. Bası, Ankara 2013. Pekcanıtez Hakan/Atalay Oğuz/Sungurtekin Özkan Meral/ Özekes Muhammet: İcra ve İflâs Hukuku Ders Kitabı, 4. Bası İstanbul 2017. Postacıoğlu İlhan: İcra Hukuku Esasları, 4. Bası, İstanbul 1982. Üstündağ Saim, İcra Hukukunun Esasları, 8. Bası, İstanbul 2004. Yıldırım Mehmet Kâmil/Deren Yıldırım Nevhis, İcra Hukuku, 7. Bası, İstanbul 2016. Yılmaz Ejder, İcra ve İflâs Kanunu Şerhi, Ankara 2016. Yılmaz Ejder, İcra Tazminatı, Halûk Konuralp Anısına Armağan Cilt II, s. 675 vd. Kuru Baki, İcra İnkâr Tazminatı, Yargıtay Yüzüncü Yıl Dönümü Armağanı, İstanbul 1968, s. 725-765. Postacıoğlu İlhan, İcrada İnkâr Tazminatı Üzerinde Düşünceler ve Bazı İhtilâflı Noktalar, BATİDER 1978/IX/4, s. 951 vd. |
Theory Topics
Week | Weekly Contents |
---|---|
1 | Theoretical fundamentals |
2 | Juridical nature |
3 | Comparison with cancel of opposition |
4 | Documents that can be used |
5 | Definitive objection to the opposition |
6 | Definitive objection to the opposition in comparative law |
7 | Temporary objection to the opposition in comparative law |
8 | Action in denial of debt |
9 | Proof |
10 | The substitution of a party |
11 | Synallagmatic contracts |
12 | Objection to the opposition in arbitration |
13 | Current account reconciliations |
14 | Remedies |
Practice Topics
Week | Weekly Contents |
---|
Contribution to Overall Grade
Number | Contribution | |
---|---|---|
Contribution of in-term studies to overall grade | 1 | 40 |
Contribution of final exam to overall grade | 1 | 60 |
Toplam | 2 | 100 |
In-Term Studies
Number | Contribution | |
---|---|---|
Assignments | 0 | 0 |
Presentation | 0 | 0 |
Midterm Examinations (including preparation) | 0 | 0 |
Project | 0 | 0 |
Laboratory | 0 | 0 |
Other Applications | 0 | 0 |
Quiz | 0 | 0 |
Term Paper/ Project | 0 | 0 |
Portfolio Study | 0 | 0 |
Reports | 0 | 0 |
Learning Diary | 0 | 0 |
Thesis/ Project | 0 | 0 |
Seminar | 0 | 0 |
Other | 0 | 0 |
Toplam | 0 | 0 |
No | Program Learning Outcomes | Contribution | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | Recognizing positive norms in private law and being able to define and explain the principals of methodology, | X | ||||
2 | Being able to determine, identify and restate legal problems, | X | ||||
3 | Being able to use legal interpretation principals in an efficient manner in order to analyze and resolve a legal problem and in order to develop a strategy, | X | ||||
4 | Being able to conduct academic researches on legal problems and to propose solutions, | X | ||||
5 | Assuming responsibility individually or collectively for resolving complicated legal problems, | X | ||||
6 | Being able to criticise positive norms of the law system, | X | ||||
7 | Being able to explain technical legal knowledge in private law in Turkish, French and English verbally or in writing, being able to report personal opinion concerning a legal problem verbally or in writing in a persuasive manner, | X | ||||
8 | Being able to follow up the local and international legal literature, to update technical legal knowledge permanently, to use information technology in an efficient manner in order to achieve these goals, | X | ||||
9 | Being able to conduct comparative academic researches between different law systems, | X | ||||
10 | Being able to explain and utilize academic study methodologies in order to conduct academic research on a certain legal problem. | X |
Activities | Number | Period | Total Workload |
---|---|---|---|
Class Hours | 14 | 2 | 28 |
Working Hours out of Class | 14 | 8 | 112 |
Assignments | 2 | 5 | 10 |
Presentation | 2 | 5 | 10 |
Final Examinations (including preparation) | 1 | 8 | 8 |
Total Workload | 168 | ||
Total Workload / 25 | 6.72 | ||
Credits ECTS | 7 |