Current Issues Regarding Evidence and Evidence in Civil Procedure(EHYL-424)
| Course Code | Course Name | Semester | Theory | Practice | Lab | Credit | ECTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EHYL-424 | Current Issues Regarding Evidence and Evidence in Civil Procedure | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 6 |
| Prerequisites | |
| Admission Requirements |
| Language of Instruction | Turkish |
| Course Type | Elective |
| Course Level | Masters Degree |
| Course Instructor(s) | Nur BOLAYIR nurbolayir@yahoo.com (Email) |
| Assistant | |
| Objective |
Understanding the theoretical problems and practical problems related to the law of proof and evidence and being able to propose solutions to them. Students who successfully complete this course; It examines all concepts related to the activity of proof, reveals in depth the relationship between proof and evidence, and evaluates judicial decisions on the subject. Students evaluate issues in the field of law with new thoughts, different approaches or methods. |
| Content |
Proof-Burden of proof Sort of proof Administration of proofs Relation with basic concepts of civil procedure law Relation with dominant principles of civil procedure law Determination the time of presentation of evidence Relation with concentration principle Bill Duty to cooperate in the taking of evidence Oath Res Judicata Witness Expert Discovery |
| Course Learning Outcomes | Comprehension of the objectives indicated in the part of course objective |
| Teaching and Learning Methods | Oral |
| References |
Pekcanıtez Hakan/Özekes Muhammet/Akkan Mine/Taş Korkmaz Hülya (Editörler), Pekcanıtez Usûl Medenî Usûl Hukuku, 15. Bası, İstanbul 2017. Erdönmez Güray, Medeni Usul Hukukunda Belgelerin İbrazı Mecburiyeti, 2.Baskı, İstanbul 2014. Bolayır Nur, Hukuk Yargılamasında Delillerin Toplanmasında Tarafların ve Hâkimin Rolü, İstanbul 2014. Teomete Yalabık Fulya, İngiliz ve Amerikan Hukuklarında Vakıaların Getirilmesi ile Delillerin Toplanmasında Hakimin Rolü ve Türk Hukuku Bakımından Değerlendirilmesi, İstanbul 2016. Umar Bilge/Yılmaz Ejder, İsbat Yükü, 2.Bası, İstanbul 1980. Alangoya Yavuz, Medeni Usul Hukukunda Vakıaların ve Delillerin Toplanmasına İlişkin İlkeler, İstanbul 1979. Çiftçi Pınar, Medeni Yargılama Hukukunda İspat Hakkı ve Sınırlamaları, Ankara 2018. |
Theory Topics
| Week | Weekly Contents |
|---|---|
| 1 | Proof-Burden of proof |
| 2 | Sort of proof |
| 3 | Administration of proofs |
| 4 | Relation with basic concepts of civil procedure law |
| 5 | Relation with dominant principles of civil procedure law |
| 6 | Determination the time of presentation of evidence |
| 7 | Relation with concentration principle |
| 8 | Documents and written evidence |
| 9 | Duty to cooperate in the taking of evidence |
| 10 | Oath |
| 11 | Res Judicata |
| 12 | Witness |
| 13 | Expert |
| 14 | Discovery |
Practice Topics
| Week | Weekly Contents |
|---|
Contribution to Overall Grade
| Number | Contribution | |
|---|---|---|
| Toplam | 0 | 0 |
In-Term Studies
| Number | Contribution | |
|---|---|---|
| Toplam | 0 | 0 |
| No | Program Learning Outcomes | Contribution | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | Recognizing positive norms in economic law and being able to define and explain the principals of methodology, | X | ||||
| 2 | Being able to determine, identify and restate legal problems, | X | ||||
| 3 | Being able to use legal interpretation principals in an efficient manner in order to analyze and resolve a legal problem and in order to develop a strategy, | X | ||||
| 4 | Being able to conduct academic researches on legal problems and to propose solutions, | X | ||||
| 5 | Assuming responsibility individually or collectively for resolving complicated legal problems, | X | ||||
| 6 | Being able to criticise positive norms of the law system, | X | ||||
| 7 | Being able to explain technical legal knowledge in economic law in Turkish, French and English verbally or in writing, being able to report personal opinion concerning a legal problem verbally or in writing in a persuasive manner, | X | ||||
| 8 | Being able to follow up the local and international legal literature, to update technical legal knowledge permanently, to use information technology in an efficient manner in order to achieve these goals, | X | ||||
| 9 | Being able to conduct comparative academic researches between different law systems, | X | ||||
| 10 | Being able to explain and utilize academic study methodologies in order to conduct academic research on a certain legal problem. | X | ||||
| Activities | Number | Period | Total Workload |
|---|---|---|---|
| Class Hours | 14 | 2 | 28 |
| Working Hours out of Class | 14 | 6 | 84 |
| Assignments | 1 | 10 | 10 |
| Midterm Examinations (including preparation) | 1 | 10 | 10 |
| Final Examinations (including preparation) | 1 | 20 | 20 |
| Total Workload | 152 | ||
| Total Workload / 25 | 6.08 | ||
| Credits ECTS | 6 | ||