COURSE INFORMATION PACKAGE · ÖHDR-325

Contracts for Personal Guarantees

Elective · Turkish
ECTS
7
Local Credit
3
Theory + Practice + Lab
3 + 0 + 0
Course Level
Doctoral Degree
Prerequisites
-
Semester
2
On this page
Content Weekly Contents Assessment System Relation of Proficiency
Course Instructor(s)
Hüseyin Murat DEVELİOĞLU
hmdevelioglu@gmail.com

Content

Objective

To give informations about personal sureties

Course Content

As shown under the subject headings (topics)

Course Learning Outcomes

To gain knowledge about personal sureties

Teaching and Learning Methods

Ex-cathedra and presentations

References

Burak Özen, Kefalet Sözleşmesi, İstanbul 2016.
Murat Develioğlu, Kefalet Sözleşmesini Düzenleyen Hükümler Işığında Bağımsız Garanti Sözleşmeleri, İstanbul 2009.
Cevdet Yavuz, Borçlar Hukuku Özel Hükümler, İstanbul 2014.
Cevdet Yavuz, Borçlar Hukuku Özel Hükümler Ders Kitabı, İstanbul 2018.
Aydın Zevkliler, Emre Gökyayla, Borçlar Hukuku Özel Borç İlişkileri, Ankara, 2018.
Fikret Eren, Borçlar Hukuku Özel Hükümler, Ankara, 2018.
M. Alper Gümüş, Borçlar Hukuku Özel Hükümler (Kısa Ders Kitabı), İstanbul, 2018.
M. Alper Gümüş, Borçlar Hukuku Özel Hükümler Cilt 1-2, İstanbul 2013.

Weekly Contents

Theory Topics
Week Weekly Contents
1 The concept of assurance
2 Personal guarantees
3 Suretyship contracts
4 Guaranty contracts
5 Differences between suretyship and guarantees contracts
6 Validity of personal guarantees
7 Interpretation rules
8 Obligations of the surety
9 Rights of the surety
10 Obligations of the guarantor
11 Rights of the guarantor
12 Obligations of creditor
13 Termination of the suretyship contract
14 Termination of the guarantee contract

Assessment System

Contribution to Overall Grade
Activities Number Contribution
Contribution of in-term studies to overall grade 1 40
Contribution of final exam to overall grade 1 60
Total 2 100
In-Term Studies
Activities Number Contribution
Assignments 0 0
Presentation 1 40
Midterm Examinations (including preparation) 0 0
Project 0 0
Laboratory 0 0
Other Applications 0 0
Quiz 0 0
Term Paper/ Project 0 0
Portfolio Study 0 0
Reports 0 0
Learning Diary 0 0
Thesis/ Project 0 0
Seminar 0 0
Other 0 0
Total 1 40

Relation of Proficiency

No Program Learning Outcomes Contribution
1 2 3 4 5
1 Recognizing positive norms in private law and being able to define and explain the principals of methodology, X
2 Being able to determine, identify and restate legal problems, X
3 Being able to use legal interpretation principals in an efficient manner in order to analyze and resolve a legal problem and in order to develop a strategy, X
4 Being able to conduct academic researches on legal problems and to propose solutions, X
5 Assuming responsibility individually or collectively for resolving complicated legal problems, X
6 Being able to criticise positive norms of the law system, X
7 Being able to explain technical legal knowledge in private law in Turkish, French and English verbally or in writing, being able to report personal opinion concerning a legal problem verbally or in writing in a persuasive manner, X
8 Being able to follow up the local and international legal literature, to update technical legal knowledge permanently, to use information technology in an efficient manner in order to achieve these goals, X
9 Being able to conduct comparative academic researches between different law systems, X
10 Being able to explain and utilize academic study methodologies in order to conduct academic research on a certain legal problem. X